Framing Analysis: Do Illegal Online Loans Have Fraud
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33603/jka.vol7.no2.a12Keywords:
Accounting, Framing, Fraud, Illegal online loansAbstract
This study aims to examine how the framing of news illegal online loan fraud in online mass media which is then used as information to find out the causes of the fraudulent practices. The Pan and Kosicki framing analysis method, which was extended with the fraud hexagon theory, were used. The sites in this study were online mass media, particularly tribunnews.com and kompas.com, reporting cases of fraud committed by illegal online lending companies. The results of the framing analysis on the news published by Tribunnews.com show that illegal online lending companies have committed fraudulent practices to their customers and their existence is very disturbing to the public. Kompas.com uses a more preventive method by revealing the ways that the people should do to avoid these traps and fraud. The results of the analysis using the fraud hexagon theory show that fraudulent practices committed by illegal online lending companies are caused by pressure from capital owners, information technology capabilities owned, broad market opportunities, rationalization that people need fast funds, ego, and binding agreements as a form of collusion. The increasing role of the government in providing protection for the public in online transactions is an important implication of this research.References
Abdurrahman, L. A., & Supriadi, Y. (2020). Penerapan jurnalisme positif dalam pemberitaan pada media Good News From Indonesia. Prosiding Jurnalistik, 6(1), 59-63.
Ashuri, T., & Halperin, R. (2017). "Losers" and "Winners": Framing of Online Self-Disclosure in Online News Media. Information Society, 33(5), 291-300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1354111
Borah, P. (2021). Competitive Framing, Emotion and Heterogeneity: Framing Effects on Twitter in The Case of an Alt-Right Rally. Online Information Review, 45(6), 1131-1147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-10-2020-0443
Budiyanti, E. (2019). Upaya Mengatasi Bisnis finansial teknologi Ilegal., Vol XI. Jurnal Info Singkat, XI(04/II/Puslit), 19-24.
Chaer, A. (2015). Psikolinguistik: Kajian Teoretik. Jakarta Rineka Cipta.
Cheng, H., & Guo, R. (2020). Risk Preference of the Investors and the Risk of Peer-to-Peer Lending Platform Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 56(7), 1520-1531. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2019.1574223
Davis, K., Maddock, R., & Foo, M. (2017). Catching up with Indonesia’s fintech industry. Law and Financial Markets Review, 11(1), 33–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17521440.2017.1336398
Desviana, Basri, Y. M., & Nasrizal. (2020). Analisis Kecurangan pada Pengelolaan Dana Desa dalam Perspektif Fraud Hexagon. Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 3(1), 50-73. doi:https://doi.org/10.21632/saki.3.1.50-73
Eriyanto. (2012). Analisis Framing: Konstruksi, Ideologi, dan Politik Media. (Edisi Khusus Komunitas (3 ed.). Yogyakarta: LKiS Group.
Ferrari, R. (2016). FinTech Impact on Retail Banking - From a Universal Banking Model to Banking Verticalization The FinTech Book (pp. 248–252). USA: Entrepreneurs and Visionaries.
Gomber, P., Koch, J.-A., & Siering, M. (2017). Digital Finance and FinTech: current research and future research directions Journal of Business Economics, 87(5), 537–580. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-017-0852-x
Jagtiani, J., & Lemieux, C. (2018). Do fintech lenders penetrate areas that are underserved by traditional banks? . Journal of Economics and Business, 100, 43-54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2018.03.001
Kiarie, R. K. (2021). Ethics in Mobile Banking: A Case Study of Kenya's Mobile Money Platform Research Anthology on Concepts, Applications and Challenges of Fintech. USA: IGI Global Publisher.
Leong, C., Tan, B., Xiao, X., Tan, F. T. C., & Sun, Y. (2017). Nurturing a FinTech ecosystem: The case of a youth microloan startup in China International Journal of Information Management, 37(2), 92–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.11.006, 37(2), 92-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.11.006
Manan, Y. M. (2019). Sistem Integrasi Proteksi & Manajemen Resiko Platform Fintech peer to peer (P2P) Lending dan Payment Gateway untuk Meningkatkan Akselerasi Pertumbuhan UMKM 3.0. Ihtifaz: Journal of Islamic Economics, Finance, and Banking, 2(1), 73-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.12928/ijiefb.v2i1.847
Nina, N., & Triyanto, T. (2021). Analisis Framing Pada Pemberitaan Covid-19 di Media Online Sebagai Bahan Pengembangan Modul Jurnalisme Positif Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 7(4), 1750-1758. doi: https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v7i4.1509
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) Nomor 77/POJK.01/2016 tentang Layanan Pinjam Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi Informasi. (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2016 Nomor 324, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 6005)
Omarini, E. (2018). Peer-to-Peer lending: Business Model Analysis and the Platform Dilemma. International Journal of Finance, Economics and Trade, 2(3), 31-41. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.19070/2643-038X-180005
Ozcelik, H. (2020). An Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Using the Fraud Diamond Theory Perspective: An Empirical Study on the Manufacturing Sector Companies Listed on the Borsa Istanbul. Contemporary Issues In Audit Management and Forensic Accounting, 102, 131-153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/s1569-375920200000102012
Ozili., P. K. (2018). Impact of digital finance on financial inclusion and stability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 18(4), 329-340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2017.12.003
Panginan, E. K., & Irwansyah. (2020). Fenomena Aplikasi Kredit dan Pinjaman Online Kredivo di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Kajian Media, 4(1), 12-26. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.31002/jkkm.v4i1
Raden, A. E. W., & Bambang, E. T. (2019). Praktik Finansial Teknologi Ilegal dalam Bentuk Pinjaman online Ditinjau dari Etika Bisnis Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(3), 379-391. doi:https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i3.379-391
Romānova, I., & Kudinska, M. (2016). Banking and Fintech: A Challenge or Opportunity? . Contemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis, 98, 21-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2018.07.003
Saksonova, S., & Kuzmina-Merlino, I. (2017). Fintech as financial innovation - The possibilities and problems of implementation. European Research Studies Journal, 20(3), 961-973. doi:https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/757
Sari, S. P., & Nugroho, N. K. (2020). Financial Statements Fraud dengan Pendekatan Vousinas Fraud Hexagon Model: Tinjauan pada Perusahaan Terbuka di Indonesia. 1st Annual Conference of Ihtifaz, 409-430.
Shonhadji, N. (2020). Paradox of White Collar Crime and Fraud in Banking: Critical Analysis of Agency Theory and Gone Theory. ASSETS Jurnal Akuntansi dan Pendidikan, 9(2), 142-155. doi:http://doi.org/10.25273/jap.v9i2.6415
Suseno, A. W., & Yeti, S. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Korporasi Fintech Lending Ilegal dalam Perspektif Perlindungan Konsumen Law Review, XXI(1), 117-144. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/lr.v0i0.3544
Teten, T. (2021). Pelanggaran Penyelenggara Peer To Peer (P2P) Lending Financial Technology Ilegal Terhadap Debitur Logika: Jurnal Penelitian Universitas Kuningan, 12(1), 85-93. doi:https://doi.org/10.25134/logika.v12i01.4040
Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing Theory of Fraud: The S.C.O.R.E. Model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372-381. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128
Wang, Y., Han, X., Li, Y., & Liu, F. (2021). Efficiency and Effect of Regulatory Policies on the Online Peer-to-peer (P2P) Lending Industry. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, ahead of print, 1-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496x.2021.1882987
Yudha, E., Eleazar, A., & Wahyu, R. (2021). Analisis Framing Pemberitaan Media Online Tribunjogja.com dan Detik.com (Kasus Suap Taufik Hidayat dan Eks Menpora). Jurnal Audience: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 4(1), 128-140. doi: https://doi.org/10.33633/ja.v4i01.4388
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
